pmatos abandoned this revision.
pmatos added a comment.

In D91428#2413292 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91428#2413292>, @pmatos wrote:

> Thanks, @arichardson and @jrtc27 for your comments. 
> I am definitely surprised to find that if you explicitly mark the call with 
> the address space, this patch is not required. At first look, this RFC is not 
> required any more but I need sometime to investigate further. If no changes 
> are necessary, this is indeed good news.

Thank you for your comments - I am dropping this patch and the RFC as it is 
indeed not required by my use case.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91428/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91428

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to