segoon added a comment. In D90944#2418845 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90944#2418845>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> In D90944#2418792 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90944#2418792>, @segoon wrote: > >> - mark mt-unsafe decls and check for marks in exprs > > Eeeh. > I was thinking of either some smart matcher "match any function declaration > with name from these lists, and then match every call to said decl". I tried to utilize bind()+equalsBoundNode(), but it seems it's impossible to mark and use the mark in a single matcher. > But the current implementation, i'm not sure this approach is even legal for > checks. The trick is stolen from abseil/UpgradeDurationConversionsCheck.h. If it's invalid here, then abseil should be fixed too. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90944/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90944 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
