jhenderson added a comment. In D85474#2398858 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85474#2398858>, @MaskRay wrote:
> Sent https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146676.html "Add > -fbinutils-version=" (cross posted to cfe-dev) so that more folks can notice > it. > > About "generate code that doesn't care about GNU as/ld > compatibility/limitation", I am open for suggestions. Currently I like > `-fbinutils-version=none` the most (after considering `future` and `latest` > and `99` (assuming GNU binutils 99 implements everything we need...)) I like `none`. `latest` has some connotations that we attempt compatibility with some specific bleeding edge set of tools, which might not be true, especially if they've released at a different time point to us. `none` implies there is no specific guarantee for compatibility to me. `99` (or other number) seems risky/short-sighted given the way versioning sometimes shoots up versus the longetivity of some of these code bases. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85474/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85474 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
