erik.pilkington added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/using-if-exists-attr.cpp:16
+template <class>
+using template_alias UIE = NS::x; // expected-warning {{'using_if_exists'
attribute only applies to named declarations, types, and value declarations}}
+
----------------
ldionne wrote:
> I assume the attribute is ignored on these declarations? Why is this not an
> error instead, since it's clearly a programmer mistake?
Yeah, its just ignored. This is how clang behaves generally with any
mis-applied attribute. An error seems more appropriate to me too honestly, but
that seems like a separate policy change. Maybe @aaron.ballman knows more about
the history/justification for this behaviour?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90188/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90188
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
