aaron.ballman added a comment. In D90042#2350035 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90042#2350035>, @flx wrote:
> I should note that I was only able to reproduce the false positive with the > actual implementation std::function and not our fake version here. Any reason not to lift enough of the actual definition to be able to reproduce the issue in your test cases? Does the change in definitions break other tests? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90042/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90042 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
