yaxunl added a comment. In D90174#2354249 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174#2354249>, @rjmccall wrote:
> I have objections to the code change here. I'll leave the conceptual > question to other people interested in the HIP toolchain. Is it OK to introduce a clang codegen option e.g. -fp-contract-backend=x to control the backend fp fuse option? By default it matches -ffp-contract language option, but allows being overridden by explicit option. Then HIP toolchain can use it to override the backend fp fuse option. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
