nickdesaulniers added a comment. In D87956#2348446 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956#2348446>, @void wrote:
> Why not just use "expected-error" and the like? Ah, brilliant! Thank you! Will wait to submit until tomorrow morning. ================ Comment at: llvm/docs/BitCodeFormat.rst:1072 +* code 69: ``byref`` +* code 70: ``mustprogress`` +* code 71: ``nossp`` ---------------- void wrote: > I'm tempted to say that these two adds should be a separate commit, but it's > a nit and I'll leave it up to you. Done in rG4abaf0ec0a3c Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
