rsmith added a comment.
In D89559#2339206 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559#2339206>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Since the work is 99% the same, I think I should start doing that (emitting
> BOTH in the case where it matches the default member but NOT the default free
> function CC) in this review, then do a separate commit for the MSVC compat
> mode where we emit a version for ALL of the calling conventions.
You'll also need an overload resolution tiebreaker to ensure that `+[]{}` and
the like are not ill-formed due to ambiguity.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
