leonardchan added a comment. In D85802#2332895 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802#2332895>, @phosek wrote:
> In D85802#2332808 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802#2332808>, @rnk wrote: > >> Would "f[no-]fuchsia-c++-abi-extensions" (or shorter, -ffuchsia-c++-abi) do >> the trick? I know it doesn't map well onto our current internal option >> representation, but I don't think the internal representation is >> particularly good. I'd rather limit the user-visible driver interface to >> give us the flexibility to change the internal representation in the future. > > For our use case yes, we could have `-f[no-]fuchsia-c++-abi` which would be > enabled by default when the target is Fuchsia. Will send out another patch that will use this instead. We can probably revert this in the meantime. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
