lebedev.ri added a comment. In D88789#2310967 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88789#2310967>, @efriedma wrote:
> To address the issue at hand, I think changing the isNonIntegralPointerType() > check to just isPtrOrPtrVectorTy() would be enough. I think that might make > sense? I briefly considered that, but the motivational example in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-January/080956.html was really about pointer-typed things. So while we could do that, i'm not sure how useful this fold really is overall. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88789/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88789 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
