hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def:153
COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(RecoveryASTType, 1, 0, "Preserve the type in recovery
expressions")
+COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(CDependence, 1, 0, "Build dependent AST nodes in C for
better error recovery")
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> Why is this not just the RecoveryAST flag? Is there some use of dependence
> outside the error-handling path?
>
> If the language is C, recovery-AST only works if this flag is on too. So they
> might as well always have the same value.
> If the language is C++, this flag is meaningless, right?
This flag is mainly for turning off early typo-corrections for C.
Thinking more about this, you're right, looks like using the RecoveryAST is
possible:
- these early typo-corrections applies non-C++ code, and have to be there until
we fully implemented recovery-expr-on-c;
- the current default mode of RecoveryAST: on for C++, and off for non-C++;
- for recovery-expr-on-c development, we need to turn on the RecoveryAST and
turn off these early typo-corrections;
so `if (!S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && !S.getLangOpts().RecoveryAST) {` works.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84226/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84226
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
