alexfh added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/SizeofExpressionCheck.cpp:198
@@ +197,3 @@
+}
+
+void SizeofExpressionCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
----------------
I'm probably wrong about "a more effective approach in general", but for
`sizeof` case it might be more effective, if we assume that `sizeof` doesn't
have large subtrees under it.
A separate concern is that the matchers looking up the tree are somewhat more
difficult to understand (at least to me).
Ultimately, I'm not sure what's the best approach here. Maybe find a huge file
and measure runtime of both implementations? ;)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19014
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
