MaskRay added a comment.

In D81865#2293158 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81865#2293158>, @froydnj wrote:

> In D81865#2293146 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81865#2293146>, @MaskRay wrote:
>
>> In D81865#2293066 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81865#2293066>, @dblaikie wrote:
>>
>>> In D81865#2293059 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81865#2293059>, @MaskRay wrote:
>>>
>>>> @froydnj The committed version rG31a3c5fb45b78bdaa78d94ffcc9258e839002016 
>>>> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG31a3c5fb45b78bdaa78d94ffcc9258e839002016> 
>>>> appears to be very different from the review. I guess next time your 
>>>> probably can upload the diff again if it is very diffierent
>>>
>>> Judging by a cursory glance at Phab's view of the delta ( 
>>> https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4b64ce7428b66cacfe74dbd9dbc29aff6dfb84af ) it 
>>> /looks/ like it wasn't too different. Mostly picking up upstream changes 
>>> that added "DEFERRABLE"? (I think Phab uses light green for "this changed, 
>>> but only because of upstream changes" and dark green is the actual patch 
>>> changes?)
>>
>> Sorry for the noise. What I saw previously was a mere difference in the DIAG 
>> macro and the new isDeferable... Maybe Phab presented the diff between two 
>> Diffs to me. The updated view seems good.
>
> I assumed that "add another parameter to a macro due to rebasing" was not a 
> significant enough change to warrant reposting...but as this is the first 
> patch I was committing myself, I probably should have been a bit more 
> explicit in what I was committing (even re-asking for review?  I'm not sure 
> of the norms around rebasing in the LLVM project).  My mistake!

I think that is fine. It seems that you just rebased on top of `Recommit 
"[CUDA][HIP] Defer overloading resolution diagnostics for host device 
functions"` (which actually added `isDeferable`). I somewhat read the diff 
between two Diffs and found it different from the commit and commented here. 
Sorry!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D81865/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D81865

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to