akhuang added a comment. In D87808#2282223 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87808#2282223>, @rnk wrote:
> In D87808#2280197 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87808#2280197>, @dblaikie wrote: > >> @rsmith What's the deal with these anonymous structs/unions? Why do they >> have copy/move constructors (are those technically called from the enclosing >> class's copy/move constructors?) but no default constructor to be called >> from the other ctors of the enclosing class? > > Yes, I'm curious: copy and move constructors require an object of this type > to already exist in memory. Is there a well-defined way of creating an object > of this type in memory when it has no other constructors? > > Maybe the issue is that this code is running into the lazy implicit special > member declaration optimization. Maybe the class in question has an implicit, > trivial, default constructor, but we there is no CXXConstructorDecl present > in the ctors list for the loop to find. Yeah, I'd guess that it has a constructor but it doesn't show up in the loop? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87808/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87808 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
