RKSimon added a comment.

In D87604#2272211 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87604#2272211>, @craig.topper 
wrote:

> Longer term should we have a variadic version of this like 
> __builtin_shufflevector or __builtin_convertvector that can handle any 
> reduction?

Yes, I was looking at what would be necessary for that as well - I think that 
is what is proposed in PR36691.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D87604/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D87604

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to