RKSimon added a comment. In D87604#2272211 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87604#2272211>, @craig.topper wrote:
> Longer term should we have a variadic version of this like > __builtin_shufflevector or __builtin_convertvector that can handle any > reduction? Yes, I was looking at what would be necessary for that as well - I think that is what is proposed in PR36691. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87604/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87604 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits