whisperity added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferMemberInitializerCheck.cpp:43
+static bool isLiteral(const Expr *E) {
+  return isa<StringLiteral>(E) ||
+         isa<CharacterLiteral>(E) ||
----------------
baloghadamsoftware wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > What about other kinds of literals like user-defined literals, or literal 
> > class types? Should this be using `E->getType()->isLiteralType()`?
> `E->getType()->isLiteralType()` does not work since it tells about the type, 
> not the expression itself. Here we should return `true` for literals only, 
> not for any expressions whose type is a literal type. Thus `int` is a literal 
> type, `5` is an `int` literal, but `n` or `return_any_int()` not.
@baloghadamsoftware The original comment by Aaron is left unmarked as "done" 
here.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D71199/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D71199

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to