whisperity added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/PreferMemberInitializerCheck.cpp:43 +static bool isLiteral(const Expr *E) { + return isa<StringLiteral>(E) || + isa<CharacterLiteral>(E) || ---------------- baloghadamsoftware wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > What about other kinds of literals like user-defined literals, or literal > > class types? Should this be using `E->getType()->isLiteralType()`? > `E->getType()->isLiteralType()` does not work since it tells about the type, > not the expression itself. Here we should return `true` for literals only, > not for any expressions whose type is a literal type. Thus `int` is a literal > type, `5` is an `int` literal, but `n` or `return_any_int()` not. @baloghadamsoftware The original comment by Aaron is left unmarked as "done" here. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71199/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71199 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits