rjmccall added a comment. In D87470#2268267 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87470#2268267>, @lxfind wrote:
> hmm @rjmccall, I don't think there is a stable way to test this. The code > generated for symmetric transfer is way too complicated to stably pattern > match one less item in the frame. I don't know that much about the code-generation here, but when cleanups escape into a surrounding scope, you can usually test that the cleanup is emitted before some call tied to a later statement in that scope. You don't have to test for every last instruction in the function. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87470/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87470 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
