JDevlieghere added a comment. In D87243#2261687 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87243#2261687>, @kastiglione wrote:
> If an LLVM install disabled `LLVM_ENABLE_WARNINGS`, should other builds > inherit that? I would think no, but is there a precedent for that that to be > the case? Yes, most of the `LLVM_ENABLE_*` options work that way. I guess you could argue that some of those are different because LLVM is the one "detecting" whether they should be on, such as `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB`. But `LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS` and `LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS` seem conceptually very similar to `LLVM_ENABLE_WARNINGS` so (in my opinion) it should behave the same. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87243/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87243 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
