martong added a comment.
About the whole raw offset and the related warning. There is a fundamental
question: Should we warn at `&a[0][10]` ?
void foo() {
int a[10][10];
int *p0 = &a[9][9]; // OK
int *p1 = &a[10][10]; // Out-of-bounds
static_assert(&a[0][10] == &a[1][0]);
int *p2 = &a[0][10]; // Syntactically (or technically) out-of-bounds, We
should warn here !(?)
int *p3 = &a[1][0]; // Neither syntactically nor semantically
out-of-bounds, but it aliases with p2 and p2 is flawed
}
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86874/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86874
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
