plotfi added a comment.

In D86049#2253705 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86049#2253705>, @plotfi wrote:

> I've updated the diff to reflect the alternate non-wrapper exposure. This way 
> requires the sanitizing of the exported objc_direct method name.

@rjmccall Is there a process for discussing ABI issues and considerations for 
something like this?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86049/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86049

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to