dougpuob marked 2 inline comments as not done.
dougpuob added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ReservedIdentifierCheck.h:44
llvm::Optional<FailureInfo>
- GetDeclFailureInfo(const StringRef &TypeName, const NamedDecl *Decl,
+ getDeclFailureInfo(const StringRef &TypeName, const NamedDecl *Decl,
const SourceManager &SM) const override;
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Given that the other functions in the class use the wrong style of casing, we
> should probably leave this declaration alone so it doesn't become locally
> inconsistent.
Do you mean create another function with three parameters for it?
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/IdentifierNamingCheck.cpp:428
case IdentifierNamingCheck::CT_HungarianNotation: {
const NamedDecl *pNamedDecl = dyn_cast<NamedDecl>(pDecl);
----------------
njames93 wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > I feel like I must be missing something because I don't have this enum in
> > my copy of ToT despite pulling this morning. Is the patch missing some
> > content?
> I feel like this is an incremental diff based on the first version of this
> patch rather than a diff from trunk.
@aaron.ballman and @njames93, the diff is based on first version not from
master(trunk).
Is it the best way that I should merge with the latest master(trunk) every time
before updating the diffs ?
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86671/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86671
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
