hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/ZOS.h:25
+
+ bool isPICDefault() const override { return false; }
+ bool isPIEDefault() const override { return false; }
----------------
According to the RFC re: LLVM on z/OS, the initial support in LLVM for z/OS is
only for XPLink. My understanding is that all XPLink applications are
DLL-enabled. Does being DLL-enabled not imply that the code is
position-independent?
I understand that the value of the `__DLL__` predefined macro from the XL C
compiler does not reflect the implicit DLL-enablement of XPLink code; however,
I also note that the same compiler claims falsely that `Option NODLL is ignored
because option XPLINK is specified` when `-qnodll` does actually suppress the
effect of an earlier `-qdll` in causing `__DLL__` to be defined.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86707/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86707
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
