sberg added a comment. In D85287#2199463 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85287#2199463>, @rtrieu wrote:
> Are you planning to allow this change to other warnings that use the same > helper functions? No, I didn't plan to work on this further. Just scratching that itch of why Clang didn't emit that one warning it "obviously" should have emitted. > Also, have you tried running warning over a codebase? As I wrote: "At least building LibreOffice with this change caused no false positives." (Or maybe I misunderstand your question.) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85287/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85287 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
