Xiangling_L marked 7 inline comments as done.
Xiangling_L added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/AsmPrinter.h:466
+
+  bool preprocessStructorList(const DataLayout &DL, const Constant *List,
+                              SmallVector<Structor, 8> &Structors);
----------------
jasonliu wrote:
> A doxygen comment describe what this function does, and what its return value 
> means, and mention `Structors` is an output argument.
> By looking at what this function does, it seems `buildStructorList` is a 
> better name.
I meant to and should've named this function to `preprocessXXStructorList`, let 
me know if you still prefer `buildStructorList`. And if you do, since the 
underneath of `SmallVector` is a variable-sized array, maybe we should try 
`buildSortedStructorArray`?


================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/aix-static-init-key-object.ll:6
+
+@llvm.global_ctors = appending global [1 x { i32, void ()*, i8* }] [{ i32, 
void ()*, i8* } { i32 65535, void ()* @foo, i8* @v}]
+
----------------
jasonliu wrote:
> Adding this test case would looks like we already decided how to handle .ref 
> in clang and llvm. But in fact, we haven't. I would prefer not having this 
> test.
As we discussed offline, I would adjust the error message instead.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D84534/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D84534

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to