Eugene.Zelenko added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:75
+
+  Finds complex conditions using `<`, `>`, `<=`, and `>=` that could be
+  interpreted ambiguously.
----------------
Double back-ticks, not single ones.


================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-complex-conditions.rst:6
+
+Finds complex conditions using `<`, `>`, `<=`, and `>=` that could be
+interpreted ambiguously.
----------------
Double back-ticks, not single ones.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D84898/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D84898

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to