erichkeane accepted this revision.
erichkeane added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

I looked through the code changes, and they all seem quite mechanical.  I 
believe they are all correct.

After reading through the test changes, I believe that this change is strictly 
an improvement thanks to printing the template arguments. Therefore, I don't 
believe I know of any way that htis is controversial.

That said, because I'm approving so quickly after submission, please give at 
least a few hours before committing to give the other reviewers a chance to 
take a look.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D84656/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D84656



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to