dnsampaio marked 6 inline comments as done. dnsampaio added a comment. Indeed not all of them. Fixed this time.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def:396 +/// according to the field declaring type width. +CODEGENOPT(ForceNoAAPCSBitfieldWidth, 1, 0) + ---------------- ostannard wrote: > Why is this a negative option, when the one above is positive? The enforcing of number of accesses would not be accepted if it was not an opt-in option. This one I expect it should be accepted with a single opt-out option. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72932/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72932 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
