ArcsinX added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp:252 return {}; - assert(Spelled.front().location().isFileID()); - - auto FID = sourceManager().getFileID(Spelled.front().location()); - auto It = Files.find(FID); - assert(It != Files.end()); - - const MarkedFile &File = It->second; + const MarkedFile &File = fileForSpelled(Spelled); // `Spelled` must be a subrange of `File.SpelledTokens`. ---------------- Could we use `const auto &` here as in lines 419, 434 for consistency? ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Tokens.cpp:431 +std::vector<TokenBuffer::Expansion> +TokenBuffer::expansionsAffecting(llvm::ArrayRef<syntax::Token> Spelled) const { + if (Spelled.empty()) ---------------- Will it be useful to have similar API with FileID/MarkedFile parameter? For example, we already have FileID in `SelectionTester::SelectionTester`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D84009/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D84009 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits