vsavchenko added a comment. In D83286#2148787 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83286#2148787>, @NoQ wrote:
> Data 👍 Thanks 😊 These tables are already generated by a script and I plan to make it into **a phabricator reporter**, so it is easier to put all the data we need here. > Maybe spend a few minutes remeasuring `libsoundio` more carefully, just in > case? Sure, will do! > Also i really wish we had per-TU data of that kind, to see if any particular > TUs have regressed significantly. I think we even store all this information about the run, but it needs a bit of refactoring in `CmpRuns.py` to get it in a nice way. I think it's a good feature to put into my plan for the testing system. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D83286/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D83286 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
