Hahnfeld added a comment. In D83268#2135930 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83268#2135930>, @JonChesterfield wrote:
> Aside from the API stability concern this looks uncontentious. Removes dead > arguments, generally makes things simpler. Thus LGTM. > > @Hahnfeld @ABataev - are you sufficiently persuaded that preserving the > current interface is not worth the development cost? I'm neither, and I've long argued that being able to build the OpenMP runtime(s) without Clang trunk is an important use case. These arguments have gone largely unheard, so I'll not join this discussion once more. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D83268/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D83268 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
