baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In D79431#2020951 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79431#2020951>, @Szelethus wrote:
> Sure, this is an improvement because we display more information, but I'd > argue that it isn't really a more readable warning message :) How about > > <argno>th argument to the call to <function name> > > - cannot be represented with a character > - is a null pointer > - ... , which violates the function's preconditions. > > WDYT? +1 Warning messages should be as clear as possible. Although our users are programmers, they do not necessarily understand a message "Range constraint not satisfied.". Maybe the error messages could be stored together with the function summaries. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79431/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79431 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
