baloghadamsoftware marked an inline comment as done.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/MiscTidyModule.cpp:54
@@ -55,1 +53,3 @@
+ CheckFactories.registerCheck<AssignOperatorCheck>(
+ "misc-assign-operator");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<BoolPointerImplicitConversionCheck>(
----------------
alexfh wrote:
> Check names usually contain hints at the class of problems they detect (e.g.
> "misc-inaccurate-erase" or "misc-macro-repeated-side-effects"), while
> `misc-assign-operator` doesn't serve this purpose and is overall a bit too
> vague (there's nothing wrong with assign operators per se).
>
> I wonder whether a more specific name would be more helpful to the users. I'm
> thinking of something like `misc-assign-operator-conventions`. WDYT?
I have no better idea either. Should I rename it or let us wait for other
potential reviewers proposing another name?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18265
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
