NoQ added a comment. Mmm, well, on second thought, no, that probably won't be sufficient. As long as we're willing to warn on containers about which we know //absolutely nothing//, we'll still have some of those false positives. And if we stop warning on such containers, the check will probably become much more quiet and much less useful. So i think this check will work best as an opt-in style/lint guideline. It might still make a bit more sense with path-sensitive analysis but we'll still have to accept the inevitable obvious false positives so it's probably not worth it.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71607/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71607 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
