eugenis added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp:3077
+ Value *LowShadow = IRB.CreateOr(LowA, LowB);
+ Value *Shadow = IRB.CreateInsertElement(Second, LowShadow,
IRB.getInt32(0));
+
----------------
guiand wrote:
> eugenis wrote:
> > You probably want to insert in First, not Second.
> >
> > Is the generated code any better if you OR the vectors, and then shuffle to
> > put the top element of First into the top element of the output? That's
> > what LLVM generates if I express this logic in C.
> >
> >
> The codegen is basically identical either way, but if you'd like I can still
> upload a patch to change these into shufflevector instructions.
This is much better.
Use makeArrayRef({2, 1}).
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp:3331
+ // case Intrinsic::x86_avx512_mask_sub_sd_round:
+ // case Intrinsic::x86_avx512_mask_mul_sd_round:
+ // case Intrinsic::x86_avx512_mask_div_sd_round:
----------------
Unrelated change.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer/vector_sd.ll:17
+ ; CHECK: [[OP2VEC_SHADOW:%.+]] = insertelement <2 x i64> <i64 -1, i64 -1>,
i64 [[LOWVAL_SHADOW]], i32 0
+ %op2vec = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %lowval, i32 0
+ ; CHECK: [[OP1VEC_SHADOW:%.+]] = insertelement <2 x i64> <i64 -1, i64 -1>,
i64 [[HIVAL_SHADOW]], i32 1
----------------
pass the vectors as arguments, it will make the test case a lot simpler
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82398/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82398
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
