yaxunl marked an inline comment as done. yaxunl added a comment. In D78655#2107016 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78655#2107016>, @tra wrote:
> In D78655#2105058 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78655#2105058>, @yaxunl wrote: > > > - lambdas with any lambda-capture (which must therefore have an enclosing > > function) inherit the enclosing function's HDness. > > > Nit: *any* capture does not necessarily imply existence of the enclosing > function. One can explicitly capture variables in the global scope. E.g.: > > int x; > auto l = [x=x](){ return x;}; > It seems we can only promote non-capturing lambdas, no matter whether it has enclosing function or not. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78655/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78655 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
