george.burgess.iv added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp:182
@@ -181,4 +181,3 @@
- // FIXME: We should be able to reject this before it's called
- constexpr void f() {
+ constexpr void f() { // expected-error{{constexpr function never produces a
constant expression}} expected-note@+2{{assignment to dereferenced
one-past-the-end pointer is not allowed in a constant expression}}
char foo[10] = { "z" }; // expected-note {{here}}
----------------
Aside: This test was fixed because we no longer give up on trying to look up
`foo`, because we know an unmodeled side-effect hasn't happened.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18540
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
