mstorsjo created this revision.
mstorsjo added reviewers: rjmccall, rnk.
Herald added a project: clang.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This diagnostic (which defaults to an error, added in
95833f33bda6c92e746e0b0007b69c2c30bfc693) was (as far as I can see) intended to
clearly point out cases where the C++ ABI won't match the Microsoft C++ ABI,
for cases when this is enabled via a pragma over a region of code.
The MSVC compatible struct layout feature can also be enabled via a compiler
option (-mms-bitfields). If enabled that way, one essentially can't compile any
C++ code unless also building with -Wno-incompatible-ms-struct (which GCC
doesn't support, and projects developed with GCC aren't setting).
For the MinGW target, it's expected that the C++ ABI won't match the MSVC one,
if this option is used for getting the struct layout to match MSVC.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
https://reviews.llvm.org/D81794
Files:
clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
clang/test/SemaCXX/ms_struct.cpp
Index: clang/test/SemaCXX/ms_struct.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/test/SemaCXX/ms_struct.cpp
+++ clang/test/SemaCXX/ms_struct.cpp
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct -verify
-triple i686-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct -verify
-triple armv7-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -DTEST_FOR_WARNING
-Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct -verify -triple i686-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11
%s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -DTEST_FOR_WARNING
-Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct -verify -triple armv7-apple-darwin9
-std=c++11 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -DTEST_FOR_ERROR -verify -triple
armv7-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -DNO_PRAGMA -mms-bitfields -verify -triple
armv7-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
+#ifndef NO_PRAGMA
#pragma ms_struct on
+#endif
struct A {
unsigned long a:4;
@@ -12,7 +15,7 @@
struct B : public A {
#ifdef TEST_FOR_ERROR
// expected-error@-2 {{ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible
layouts for classes with base classes or virtual functions}}
-#else
+#elif defined(TEST_FOR_WARNING)
// expected-warning@-4 {{ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible
layouts for classes with base classes or virtual functions}}
#endif
unsigned long c:16;
@@ -27,7 +30,7 @@
struct C {
#ifdef TEST_FOR_ERROR
// expected-error@-2 {{ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible
layouts for classes with base classes or virtual functions}}
-#else
+#elif defined(TEST_FOR_WARNING)
// expected-warning@-4 {{ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible
layouts for classes with base classes or virtual functions}}
#endif
virtual void foo();
@@ -36,3 +39,6 @@
static_assert(__builtin_offsetof(C, n) == 8,
"long long field in ms_struct should be 8-byte aligned");
+#if !defined(TEST_FOR_ERROR) && !defined(TEST_FOR_WARNING)
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+#endif
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -6753,7 +6753,12 @@
// headers, sweeping up a bunch of types that the project doesn't
// really rely on MSVC-compatible layout for. We must therefore
// support "ms_struct except for C++ stuff" as a secondary ABI.
+ // Don't emit this diagnostic if the feature was enabled as a
+ // language option (as opposed to via a pragma or attribute), as
+ // the option -mms-bitfields otherwise essentially makes it impossible
+ // to build C++ code, unless this diagnostic is turned off.
if (Record->isMsStruct(Context) &&
+ !Context.getLangOpts().MSBitfields &&
(Record->isPolymorphic() || Record->getNumBases())) {
Diag(Record->getLocation(), diag::warn_cxx_ms_struct);
}
Index: clang/test/SemaCXX/ms_struct.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/test/SemaCXX/ms_struct.cpp
+++ clang/test/SemaCXX/ms_struct.cpp
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct -verify -triple i686-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct -verify -triple armv7-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -DTEST_FOR_WARNING -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct -verify -triple i686-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -DTEST_FOR_WARNING -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct -verify -triple armv7-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -DTEST_FOR_ERROR -verify -triple armv7-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -DNO_PRAGMA -mms-bitfields -verify -triple armv7-apple-darwin9 -std=c++11 %s
+#ifndef NO_PRAGMA
#pragma ms_struct on
+#endif
struct A {
unsigned long a:4;
@@ -12,7 +15,7 @@
struct B : public A {
#ifdef TEST_FOR_ERROR
// expected-error@-2 {{ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible layouts for classes with base classes or virtual functions}}
-#else
+#elif defined(TEST_FOR_WARNING)
// expected-warning@-4 {{ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible layouts for classes with base classes or virtual functions}}
#endif
unsigned long c:16;
@@ -27,7 +30,7 @@
struct C {
#ifdef TEST_FOR_ERROR
// expected-error@-2 {{ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible layouts for classes with base classes or virtual functions}}
-#else
+#elif defined(TEST_FOR_WARNING)
// expected-warning@-4 {{ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible layouts for classes with base classes or virtual functions}}
#endif
virtual void foo();
@@ -36,3 +39,6 @@
static_assert(__builtin_offsetof(C, n) == 8,
"long long field in ms_struct should be 8-byte aligned");
+#if !defined(TEST_FOR_ERROR) && !defined(TEST_FOR_WARNING)
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+#endif
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -6753,7 +6753,12 @@
// headers, sweeping up a bunch of types that the project doesn't
// really rely on MSVC-compatible layout for. We must therefore
// support "ms_struct except for C++ stuff" as a secondary ABI.
+ // Don't emit this diagnostic if the feature was enabled as a
+ // language option (as opposed to via a pragma or attribute), as
+ // the option -mms-bitfields otherwise essentially makes it impossible
+ // to build C++ code, unless this diagnostic is turned off.
if (Record->isMsStruct(Context) &&
+ !Context.getLangOpts().MSBitfields &&
(Record->isPolymorphic() || Record->getNumBases())) {
Diag(Record->getLocation(), diag::warn_cxx_ms_struct);
}
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
