rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith marked 2 inline comments as done.
rsmith added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:98
+    //
+    if (DRE->isNonOdrUse() != NOUR_Unevaluated)
+      return S.Diag(DRE->getBeginLoc(),
----------------
I think this is an oversight, and we should probably allow all non-odr-use 
mentions here. I'll take this to the committee to check. But let's go with the 
rule as written for now.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:114
+    //
+    if (VDecl->isLocalVarDecl() && !DRE->isNonOdrUse())
       return S.Diag(DRE->getBeginLoc(),
----------------
Do we perform this check after finishing the full-expression and properly 
setting the 'non-odr-use' bits? Oh, I see, that's what the follow-up change is 
about :)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D81615/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D81615



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to