jtmott-intel marked 2 inline comments as done.
jtmott-intel added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:1747-1748
     break;
   case Builtin::BI__builtin_add_overflow:
   case Builtin::BI__builtin_sub_overflow:
   case Builtin::BI__builtin_mul_overflow:
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> I don't think this applies to `add`/`sub`: https://godbolt.org/z/Dj3GLP (or 
> at least not all of them?)
> OTOH this does apply to plain division/remainder: https://godbolt.org/z/SXNw8H
Correct. I passed the `BuiltinID` so that in `SemaBuiltinOverflow` I could 
check for `mul` specifically. Alternatively, I could give `mul` its own case 
"block" separate from `add`/`sub`. Thoughts/preferences?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D81420/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D81420



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to