Szelethus marked 2 inline comments as done. Szelethus added a comment. Gentle ping
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckerBase.td:141-142 +/// Describes preferred registration and evaluation order in between checkers. +/// Unlike strong dependencies, this expresses dependencies in between +/// diagnostics, and *not* modeling. In the case of an unsatisfied (disabled) +/// weak dependency, the dependent checker might still be registered. If the ---------------- NoQ wrote: > I wouldn't mind having predictable callback evaluation order for modeling as > well. What's causing you to drop this scenario? D80905#2066219 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80905/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80905 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
