jlebar added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18458#383266, @rsmith wrote:
> This makes the "`constexpr` implies `__host__` `__device__`" patch look > slightly questionable: two translation units defining the same `constexpr` > function will mangle that function differently depending on whether the > translation unit is built with CUDA support enabled. That will cause you to > get duplicates of static locals and the like (but I suppose you do anyway > between the host and the device, so maybe that's not much more broken than it > would be regardless). Hm. I agree that would be surprising to users. I suppose we could say that HD can overload D but not H. Then we could apply mangling to all device functions, solving the ambiguity that way. That feels pretty ham-fisted, though. :-/ http://reviews.llvm.org/D18458 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
