amccarth added a comment. Please make sure all of the clang VFS tests still pass before submitted this. VFS paths are inherently problematic with `llvm::sys::path` because they can legitimately be in a hybrid of Windows and Posix styles. Guessing the style from the first separator you see can be misleading, but I don't know whether that's ever wrong in this path.
Exactly which assertion is firing? Is it possible it's the assertion that's wrong? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81041/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81041 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
