njames93 added a comment. In D80884#2065270 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80884#2065270>, @gribozavr2 wrote:
> This is an interesting question. Since Clang accepts certain constructs in > older C++ standard versions as extensions, shouldn't we test AST matchers in > those modes as well? I think it could be argued either way. Clang accepts a lot of stuff for better or worse, my fist try at this was using `-pedantic-errors`, but that was throwing errors with gnu and microsoft extensions which would be a much more invasive fix to sort out. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80884/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80884 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
