MaskRay added a comment.

In D80225#2046154 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80225#2046154>, @theraven wrote:

> I'm a bit nervous about this.  I'm aware of at least one out-of-tree 
> toolchain that uses this mechanism to select their proprietary linker.  I'd 
> expect an RFC and for this to be highlighted in LLVM Weekly before I'm happy 
> that this won't break downstream consumers.


Created http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-May/065518.html


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D80225/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D80225



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [P... Fangrui Song via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • ... Fangrui Song via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • ... Fangrui Song via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • ... David Chisnall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • ... Fangrui Song via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • ... Reid "Away June-Sep" Kleckner via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • ... James Y Knight via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • ... Keith Smiley via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • ... Fangrui Song via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to