aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/unittests/Tooling/StencilTest.cpp:63 ASTContext &Context = AstUnit->getASTContext(); - auto Matches = ast_matchers::match(wrapMatcher(Matcher), Context); + auto Matches = ast_matchers::match( + traverse(ast_type_traits::TK_AsIs, wrapMatcher(Matcher)), Context); ---------------- steveire wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > Was this change made because you didn't want to accept the traversal mode > > as a parameter to `matchStmt` and force each caller to decide which mode > > they use? Or is there some other reason why this change was needed? > Yes, the test currently expects `AsIs`. If someone wanted to change that in > the future, that is an issue for future work. You say "the test" as though there's only one. There are numerous tests which use `matchStmt`. Do *all* of the tests require `AsIs`? (I think that's an example of what's causing some of the confusion @shafik and I had and I'm trying to ensure his question gets answered and that I'm fully understanding your changes.) From spot-checking, it looks like there are tests using `matchStmt` that don't need `AsIs` traversal and that this sort of cleanup work could happen in the future, but for now you're going with the easiest approach instead of expanding the test coverage for ignoring implicit nodes; is that correct? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72531/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72531 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
