zequanwu added a comment. In D78659#1997528 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78659#1997528>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> 1. Tests missing > 2. Why isn't `noinline` sufficient, why a whole new attribue? 1. Test added. 2. We want to avoid merging multiple call sites of same function, but `noinline` cannot achieve this. For example, we don't want to merge calls in `i == 5` and `i == 7` cases in the test case. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78659/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78659 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits