fhahn marked an inline comment as done.
fhahn added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/docs/MatrixTypes.rst:29
+A *matrix element type* must be a real type (as in C99 6.2.5p17) excluding
+enumeration types or an implementation-defined half-precision floating point
+type, otherwise the program is ill-formed.
----------------
rjmccall wrote:
> fhahn wrote:
> > SjoerdMeijer wrote:
> > > Now I am wondering if this requires some explanations on binary 
> > > operations for these implemenation-defined types? For example, for 
> > > `__fp16` and matrices with this `__fp16` element type, I assume 
> > > arithmetic is performed in at least the (single) floating-point 
> > > precision. So I guess in section "Arithmetic Conversions" a rule needs to 
> > > be added that the conversion of these implementation defined types need 
> > > to performed?
> > > 
> > I don't think we need to specifically discuss the implementation defined 
> > types here, as the conversions and binary operator definitions are framed 
> > in terms of the existing rules for the element types used. I am potentially 
> > missing something, but with the current wording the conversions for 
> > `__fp16` would use the conversion rules for that type and the binary 
> > operators would use the arithmetic rules for it.
> Yeah, for the scalar conversions / scalar operands, you should just say that 
> the source has to be a real type and not otherwise restrict it.  All of those 
> types should already be convertible to any matrix element type.
Thanks, I've updated the wording to ensure the scalar values are of a real type 
in the scalar -> matrix conversion and scalar, matrix binary operator contexts. 
I hope that is enough to clarify things.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D76612/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D76612



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to