jdoerfert marked an inline comment as done.
jdoerfert added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:1831
          "OpenMP device compilation mode is expected.");
+  // TODO: Do not check outside of functions for now as the targetDiag below
+  //       requires one.
----------------
Fznamznon wrote:
> Please ignore my comment if it says nonsense. It actually can since I don't 
> know a lot about OpenMP but,
> looking into `targetDiag`, I would say that underlying function 
> (`diagIfOpenMPDeviceCode` in case of OpenMP device mode) should check that we 
> actually have current function because it does `getCurFunctionDecl()` call.
> Otherwise any attempt to emit diagnostic in OpenMP device mode using 
> `targetDiag` or `diagIfOpenMPDeviceCode` will fail outside of functions.
It's not nonsense. I think the current system is not meant for non-function 
diagnostics. That said, I could probably bail later in the call chain, e.g. in 
`diagIfOpenMPDeviceCode`. Later we should rethink how this is done as we adopt 
to a more user-friendly model.



Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77918/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77918



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to