yaxunl updated this revision to Diff 256903.
yaxunl retitled this revision from "[CUDA][HIP] Fix overload resolution issue
for device host functions" to "[CUDA][HIP] Fix host/device based overload
resolution".
yaxunl added a comment.
Revised by John's comments.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77954/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77954
Files:
clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
clang/test/SemaCUDA/function-overload.cu
Index: clang/test/SemaCUDA/function-overload.cu
===================================================================
--- clang/test/SemaCUDA/function-overload.cu
+++ clang/test/SemaCUDA/function-overload.cu
@@ -331,9 +331,6 @@
// If we have a mix of HD and H-only or D-only candidates in the overload set,
// normal C++ overload resolution rules apply first.
template <typename T> TemplateReturnTy template_vs_hd_function(T arg)
-#ifdef __CUDA_ARCH__
-//expected-note@-2 {{declared here}}
-#endif
{
return TemplateReturnTy();
}
@@ -342,11 +339,13 @@
}
__host__ __device__ void test_host_device_calls_hd_template() {
- HostDeviceReturnTy ret1 = template_vs_hd_function(1.0f);
- TemplateReturnTy ret2 = template_vs_hd_function(1);
#ifdef __CUDA_ARCH__
- // expected-error@-2 {{reference to __host__ function 'template_vs_hd_function<int>' in __host__ __device__ function}}
+ typedef HostDeviceReturnTy ExpectedReturnTy;
+#else
+ typedef TemplateReturnTy ExpectedReturnTy;
#endif
+ HostDeviceReturnTy ret1 = template_vs_hd_function(1.0f);
+ ExpectedReturnTy ret2 = template_vs_hd_function(1);
}
__host__ void test_host_calls_hd_template() {
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -9475,6 +9475,35 @@
else if (!Cand1.Viable)
return false;
+ // If Cand1 can be emitted and Cand2 cannot be emitted in the current context,
+ // Cand1 is better than Cand2. If Cand1 can not be emitted and Cand2 can be
+ // emitted, Cand1 is not better than Cand2. This rule should have precedence
+ // over other rules.
+ //
+ // If both Cand1 and Cand2 can be emitted, or neither can be emitted, then
+ // other rules should be used to determine which is better.
+ //
+ // If other rules cannot determine which is better, CUDA preference will be
+ // used again to determine which is better.
+ //
+ // TODO: Currently IdentifyCUDAPreference does not return correct values
+ // for functions called in global variable initializers due to missing
+ // correct context about device/host. Therefore we can only enforce this
+ // rule when there is a caller. We should enforce this rule for functions
+ // in global variable initializers once proper context is added.
+ if (S.getLangOpts().CUDA && Cand1.Function && Cand2.Function) {
+ if (FunctionDecl *Caller = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(S.CurContext)) {
+ auto Cand1Emittable = S.IdentifyCUDAPreference(Caller, Cand1.Function) >
+ Sema::CFP_WrongSide;
+ auto Cand2Emittable = S.IdentifyCUDAPreference(Caller, Cand2.Function) >
+ Sema::CFP_WrongSide;
+ if (Cand1Emittable && !Cand2Emittable)
+ return true;
+ if (!Cand1Emittable && Cand2Emittable)
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
// C++ [over.match.best]p1:
//
// -- if F is a static member function, ICS1(F) is defined such
@@ -9709,12 +9738,6 @@
return Cmp == Comparison::Better;
}
- if (S.getLangOpts().CUDA && Cand1.Function && Cand2.Function) {
- FunctionDecl *Caller = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(S.CurContext);
- return S.IdentifyCUDAPreference(Caller, Cand1.Function) >
- S.IdentifyCUDAPreference(Caller, Cand2.Function);
- }
-
bool HasPS1 = Cand1.Function != nullptr &&
functionHasPassObjectSizeParams(Cand1.Function);
bool HasPS2 = Cand2.Function != nullptr &&
@@ -9722,7 +9745,19 @@
if (HasPS1 != HasPS2 && HasPS1)
return true;
- return isBetterMultiversionCandidate(Cand1, Cand2);
+ if (isBetterMultiversionCandidate(Cand1, Cand2))
+ return true;
+
+ // If other rules cannot determine which is better, CUDA preference is used
+ // to determine which is better.
+ if (S.getLangOpts().CUDA && Cand1.Function && Cand2.Function) {
+ if (FunctionDecl *Caller = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(S.CurContext)) {
+ return S.IdentifyCUDAPreference(Caller, Cand1.Function) >
+ S.IdentifyCUDAPreference(Caller, Cand2.Function);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return false;
}
/// Determine whether two declarations are "equivalent" for the purposes of
@@ -9808,33 +9843,6 @@
std::transform(begin(), end(), std::back_inserter(Candidates),
[](OverloadCandidate &Cand) { return &Cand; });
- // [CUDA] HD->H or HD->D calls are technically not allowed by CUDA but
- // are accepted by both clang and NVCC. However, during a particular
- // compilation mode only one call variant is viable. We need to
- // exclude non-viable overload candidates from consideration based
- // only on their host/device attributes. Specifically, if one
- // candidate call is WrongSide and the other is SameSide, we ignore
- // the WrongSide candidate.
- if (S.getLangOpts().CUDA) {
- const FunctionDecl *Caller = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(S.CurContext);
- bool ContainsSameSideCandidate =
- llvm::any_of(Candidates, [&](OverloadCandidate *Cand) {
- // Check viable function only.
- return Cand->Viable && Cand->Function &&
- S.IdentifyCUDAPreference(Caller, Cand->Function) ==
- Sema::CFP_SameSide;
- });
- if (ContainsSameSideCandidate) {
- auto IsWrongSideCandidate = [&](OverloadCandidate *Cand) {
- // Check viable function only to avoid unnecessary data copying/moving.
- return Cand->Viable && Cand->Function &&
- S.IdentifyCUDAPreference(Caller, Cand->Function) ==
- Sema::CFP_WrongSide;
- };
- llvm::erase_if(Candidates, IsWrongSideCandidate);
- }
- }
-
// Find the best viable function.
Best = end();
for (auto *Cand : Candidates) {
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
