NoQ added a comment. In D77722#1969391 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77722#1969391>, @Szelethus wrote:
> Wait, we don't already assume `nonnull` attributed parameters as, well, not > null? That's crazy. That's only for the top frame. For nested stack frames we're not only assuming they're not null, we're also emitting a warning when they're null. But, yeah, it's clearly an unfortunate omission. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77722/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77722 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
